Decision 2015: 3 Ways the Supreme Court Could Rule on Marriage

June 23, 2015

June 23, 2015

Like you, Equality Federation staff and board are on pins and needles with anticipation for the Supreme Court’s ruling on the freedom to marry. At press time, the Court has indicated that a decision could be issued on Thursday, Friday, or Monday.

Regardless of how the Court rules, our movement has much to be proud of at this historic moment. We are especially proud of the role our members, the state-based equality groups, have played in growing public support for the freedom to marry to more than 60%. For the past 15+ years, many organizations have canvassed, joined amicus briefs, lobbied their legislators, and amplified the power of the thousands of brave couples willing to share their stories, to bring us to this day.

There are three possible outcomes when the Justices issue their ruling:

  • Victory! The Court could grant us the freedom to marry nationwide by ruling that marriage bans are unconstitutional.
  • The Court could rule that non-marriage states must respect marriages legally performed elsewhere, but that those states can keep in place their discriminatory bans.
  • The Court could rule that marriage bans do not violate the Constitution and that non-marriage states do not have to respect the legal marriages of same-sex couples.

We, along with the legal groups and other movement leaders, are feeling very hopeful about the outcome, but no matter what, we know that we have made enormous progress and we will continue to harness that progress until, finally, all Americans are protected from discrimination under the law.

On the day the Court rules we will be updating our blog and social media with analysis and resources. 

More You might like

Meet Our Newest State Partners!

We’re so excited to introduce you to the newest members of our state partner network: IYG and Fairness Pennsylvania!

March 19, 2025
Black & LGBTQ+ Organizations Mobilize in High-Stakes Supreme Court Battle

We joined The Center for HIV Law and Policy (CHLP), PrEP in Black America (PIBA), Afiya Center (Dallas), Women with a Vision (New Orleans), SisterLove (Atlanta), and BlaqOut (Kansas City, Missouri) in filing an amicus, or “friend of the court,” brief in the Braidwood v Kennedy case on appeal in the Supreme Court in order to take a stand defending access to preventative health care nationally and to protect the Black and brown lives that will be lost should this access be overturned.

March 19, 2025
Leading Doesn’t Have to Be Lonely

Last month, we hosted our New Executive Director Intensive, one of our longest-running leadership programs. For over a decade, this program has brought together Executive Directors who are new in their role to foster healthy, sustainable organizations and leadership practices. Here are inspiring takeaways we got out of this year’s intensive!

March 19, 2025
A young man looking up, smilingA young man smiling straight at the camera
Confident young woman standing with crossed arms.

Want To Make A Difference? Support Our Work

With your support, we'll be able to continue our work to build the leaders of today and tomorrow, strengthen state-based LGBTQ+ organizations, and make critical progress on the issues that matter most—like protecting transgender people, ending HIV criminalization and ensuring access to care, and banning conversion therapy across the country.